Reference existence check
Hallucinated Citations Checker — Does This Paper Exist?
Paste references that look scholarly but may have been invented by an AI assistant. LitSource runs a reference existence check against scholarly records: first whether the paper exists, then whether title, authors, year, journal, and DOI match. A matched record is not proof the paper supports your claim.
Paste Format Example
Chen, L., Okonkwo, P. (2024). Mitochondrial CRISPR editing reverses diabetic nephropathy in a multicenter RCT. Nature Medicine, 31(2), 188-196.
Detected: 0 referencesEstimated cost: 3 credit(s)Sign up and get 10 credits
Checking account access and input limits…
- 01
Reference existence check first
Ask whether a real paper record exists before treating an AI-written citation as usable.
- 02
Catch invented bibliographic details
Compare title, authors, year, journal, and DOI so a fluent but invented citation does not pass as a real paper.
- 03
Existence is not claim support
A matched record only shows the paper exists. You still need to read it before citing it for a specific claim.
What a result means
- What is a hallucinated citation?
- An AI assistant can invent a fluent title, author list, journal, year, or DOI that does not correspond to a real paper. This page checks existence first.
- If no record is found, is the citation fabricated?
- Not automatically. An unmatched result means you should review spelling, identifiers, and other databases. Absence of a match is not proof of fabrication.
- Does a real paper support my sentence?
- No. A reference existence check only asks whether the paper exists and whether the bibliographic details match. Claim support requires reading the study.
- Screen AI-invented bibliographies. Check ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini reference lists for citations that do not correspond to a real paper.
- Review suspicious fluent citations. When a reference looks polished but cannot be found in PubMed or publisher records, inspect it before you cite.
- Clear unresolved items before submission. Flag unmatched or conflicting citations so they do not reach a reviewer, editor, or supervisor.
Chen, L., Okonkwo, P. (2024). Mitochondrial CRISPR editing reverses diabetic nephropathy in a multicenter RCT. Nature Medicine, 31(2), 188-196.
